tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-441311798014442796.post3928110895998733854..comments2019-02-14T05:15:45.800-08:00Comments on Scientists in Congregations (SinC): N. T. Wright: Can a Scientist Believe the Resurrection? Part One Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-441311798014442796.post-67069581987205717142013-03-22T22:54:00.276-07:002013-03-22T22:54:00.276-07:00I love Wright, and this is great stuff, but he doe...I love Wright, and this is great stuff, but he doesn't quite get it right with the "Science can't say anything about what doesn't repeat." The Big Bang happened once, and Science looks at evidence and quite righly assumes that the basic nature of matter and energy are consistent across time. If they are repeatable now, then, it follows, they have always been repeatable and have always repeated as such. This is why a biologist would have to wonder how a dead body would come alive again--because to do so, it would violate the way organisms and tissues and cells work. The issue here isn't that Science doesn't say anything about history, but that Science doesn't say anything about the supernatural. It CAN'T claim that nothing ever supernatural has occured. And since it can't, then we are left only with history to give us an idea of whether something supernatural did occur or not.Natehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02704773322342913204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-441311798014442796.post-61552326788508023422013-03-22T22:51:12.682-07:002013-03-22T22:51:12.682-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Natehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02704773322342913204noreply@blogger.com